Odd this day

20 January 1918

Coates
4 min readJan 20, 2025

On this day 107 years ago, biographer, critic and Bloomsburyist Lytton Strachey popped round Virginia Woolf’s gaff and talked dirty.

Lytton Strachey (a man looking at camera with glasses and a shovel beard) and Virginia Woolf (a woman in a hat and dress, looking at Strachey) sitting on a bench in a garden

According to Woolf’s diary, (although she wrote the entry the following day):

Lytton came to tea … Among other things he gave us an amazing account of the British Sex Society which meets at Hampstead … fifty people of both sexes and various ages discussed without shame such questions as the deformity of Dean [Jonathan] Swift’s penis; whether cats use the w.c., self abuse; incest… Lytton at different points exclaimed Penis: his contribution to the openness of the debate.

This was not the only occasion on which Mr Strachey had lowered the tone at Bloomsbury HQ. Later in life, Woolf wrote a sort-of memoir, Moments of Being, and described an occasion about a decade earlier:

Another scene [which] has always lived in my memory — I do not know if I invented it or not … It was a spring evening. Vanessa [Bell, Woolf’s sister] and I were sitting in the drawing room…

Vanessa sat silent and did something mysterious with her needle or her scissors. I talked, egotistically, excitedly, about my own affairs no doubt. Suddenly the door opened and the long and sinister figure of Mr Lytton Strachey stood on the threshold. He pointed his finger at a stain on Vanessa’s white dress. ‘Semen?’ he said. Can one really say it? I thought and we burst out laughing.

A couple of pages earlier, she wrote that when she’d first met him in around 1904, Strachey (and two friends, painter Saxon Sydney-Turner, and Duncan Bell, still Vanessa’s husband-to-be at that point)

came in hesitatingly, self-effacingly, and folded themselves up quietly [in] the corners of sofas. For a long time they said nothing. None of our old conversational openings seemed to do.

But it seems the intervening years had cured ‘The Strache’ of his shyness. He was given that nickname by Virginia and Vanessa’s ill-fated brother Thoby when they were at Cambridge together — when Strachey had, however, already developed the habit of bursting into people’s dwellings and making inexplicable exclamations.

‘The Strache’ was the essence of culture … He had French pictures in his rooms. He had a passion for Pope. He was exotic, extreme in every way-Thoby described him so long, so thin that his thigh was no thicker than Thoby’s arm. Once he burst into Thoby’s rooms, cried out, “Do you hear the music of the spheres?” and fell in a faint. Once in the midst of a dead silence, he piped up-and Thoby could imitate his voice perfectly — “Let’s all write Sonnets to Robertson.” He was a prodigy of wit
The Robertson referred to was fellow student A J Robertson

At some point after Cambridge, according to Bonnie Kime Scott’s Refiguring Modernism: Women of 1928, Thoby had initiated the Thursday evening gatherings in Bloomsbury. He had sadly succumbed to typhoid in 1907, but the soirées — and Woolf’s friendship with Strachey — continued.

In summary, anyway: during the late 1910s, the man who went on to write Eminent Victorians said ‘semen’ in more or less polite society, and

With that one word all barriers of reticence and reserve went down. A flood of the sacred fluid seemed to overwhelm us.

What a charming mental picture, Virginia, thank you.

Sex permeated our conversation.

The word bugger was never far from our lips. We discussed copulation with the same excitement and openness that we had discussed the nature of good. It is strange to think … how reserved we had been … It seems a marvel now that … Clive had blushed and I had blushed too when I asked him to let me pass to go to the lavatory … I never dreamt of asking Vanessa to tell me what happened on her wedding night. … When all intellectual questions had been debated so freely, sex was ignored.

So, even if sexual intercourse began in 1963, at least a few people had already been talking about it for 45 years — although not always in the high-minded terms Woolf initially claims. Before the paragraph is out, she’s confessed that they listened to the stories of their gay friends’ affairs “with rapt interest”:

We followed the ups and downs of their chequered histories; Vanessa sympathetically; I … frivolously, laughingly. “Norton tells me”, Vanessa would say, “that James is in utter despair. Rupert has been twice to bed with Hobhouse” and I would cap her stories with some equally thrilling piece of gossip; about a divine undergraduate with a head like a Greek God — but alas his teeth were bad — called George Mallory.

That is, indeed, the George Mallory who died on Everest in 1924 — and who used to exchange letters with Strachey in which he employed such phrases as

What a wicked old sodomite you are

So, yes: here I am taking the piss out of far-more-eminent-writer-than-I Virginia Woolf, while pruriently fishing out the salacious bits of history myself. Well, of course I bloody am. Those are the interesting parts.

But if you want proper intellectual curiosity, let’s nip back to the top there, and the clearly most important question posed by the British Sex Society in the early years of the 20th century. No, not the bit about Jonathan Swift’s penis (Lilliputian? Brobdingnagian?) — although I shall of course be investigating that one day. No, I mean:

whether cats use the w.c.

Thanks to another significant cultural figure — this time a legendary jazz musician — we know the answer.

The Charles Mingus CAT-alog for Toilet Training Your Cat — a booklet illustrated with a b/w photo of a cat sat on a toilet

You can (if you can forgive me for recycling not-even-that-old material) find out more about that here:

(although that involves a bit of scrolling if you don’t want to read all the other guff). If you want a version that cuts to the chase, though, there’s this:

So, that’s a thing you know now. You really are most welcome.

--

--

Coates
Coates

Written by Coates

Purveyor of niche drivel; marker of odd anniversaries

No responses yet