Odd this day

Coates
4 min readAug 2, 2023

--

Well, if it’s 2 August, it must be… yes, of course: 237th anniversary of the time Margaret Nicholson tried to stab George III, but failed to do him any damage — not least because her weapon of choice was “an old ivory-handled dessert knife”.

Still from The Madness of King George in which Janine Duvitski as Margaret is manhandled away from Nigel Hawthorne as George III

There is a dramatic telling of the incident in novelist Fanny Burney’s diary that day, which suggests that being right-handed and having the knife in her left might have been part of Margaret’s difficulty

You may have heard it wrong; I will concisely tell it right. His carriage had just stopped at the garden-door at St James’s, and he had just alighted from it, when a decently dressed woman, who had been waiting for him some time, approached him with a petition. It was rolled up, and had the usual superscription — For the King’s Most Excellent Majesty. She presented it with her right hand; and, at the same moment that the King bent forward to take it, she drew from it, with her left hand, a knife, with which she aimed straight at his heart!

The fortunate awkwardness of taking the instrument with the left hand made her design perceived before it could be executed; the King started back, scarce believing the testimony of his own eyes; and the woman made a second thrust, which just touched his waistcoat before he had time to prevent her; and at that moment one of the attendants, seeing her horrible intent, wrenched the knife from her hand.

In The Politics of Regicide in England, 1760–1850, however, historian Steve Poole says “As the King recoiled, she was prevented from making a second lunge by a yeoman and a footman who pulled her away to the guard house”.

Either way, Burney suggests that the king’s first concern was for his tailoring.

‘Has she cut my waistcoat?’ cried he, in telling it — ‘Look! for I have had no time to examine.’ Thank heaven, however, the poor wretch had not gone quite so far. “Though nothing,’ added the King, in giving his relation, ‘could have been sooner done, for there was nothing for her to go through but a thin linen and fat.’

…and that he then called for restraint in dealing with her (and we can speculate that he’d seen that her knife thrust was half-hearted, or that the blade was useless for the task, but it’s still pretty magnanimous of him)

the assassin was seized by the populace, who were tearing her away, no doubt to fall the instant sacrifice of her murtherous purpose, when the King, the only calm and moderate person, called aloud to the mob, ‘The poor creature is mad! Do not hurt her! She has not hurt me!’ He then came forward, and showed himself to all the people, declaring he was perfectly safe and unhurt; and then gave positive orders that the woman should be taken care of, and went into the palace, and had his levée.
all these entries are from The Faber Book of Diaries, by the way

Perhaps Fanny is laying it on a bit thick here, though (keeper of the robes to Queen Charlotte though she was):

There is something in the whole of his behaviour upon this occasion that strikes me as proof indisputable of a true and noble courage: for in a moment so extraordinary — an attack in this country, unheard of before — to settle so instantly that it was the effect of insanity, to feel no apprehension of private plot or latent conspiracy to stay out, fearlessly, among his — people, and so benevolently to see himself to the safety of one who had raised her arm against his life — these little traits, all impulsive, and therefore to be trusted, have given me an impression of respect and reverence that I can never forget, and never think of but with fresh admiration.

Anyway, the Privy Council, Poole says, “ruled her unfit to stand trial for high treason” and, according to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Margaret was “declared insane and, on the order of the home secretary, committed to Bethlem for life”.

Mind you, in her lodgings was

a cache of letters to public figures, replete with the delusion concerning her rightful claim to the throne, warning that ‘England would be discharged with blood for a thousand years if her claims were not publicly acknowledged’.

Margaret remained in Bethlem Hospital for the remaining 42 years of her life, but was not the first or indeed last of George III’s would-be assassins. One Rebecca O’Hara got in first by lunging at him in 1778, and quite a few people threw stones over the years. But the most spectacular attempt was definitely James Hadfield’s, when he fired a pistol at George in the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane in 1800.

contemporary b/w image (possibly an engraving): James Hadfield shoots at George III, 15 May 1800. A man stands up in the stalls of a theatre firing a gun at the royal box. A man in a wig, presumably the king, looks shocked

Barrister Thomas Erskine argued that severe head injuries sustained in battle had caused his client’s delusions, and the jury found him not guilty — but the judge said he “must not be discharged”, and

Parliament quickly passed the Criminal Lunatics Act 1800 that provide for indefinite and automatic confinement for insane defendants.

Only one other person came at George III with a knife during his reign — but he did face fewer assassination attempts than his granddaughter, who totted up an impressive eight.

--

--

Coates
Coates

Written by Coates

Purveyor of niche drivel; marker of odd anniversaries

Responses (1)