Odd this day

Coates
4 min readMay 26, 2023

--

Well… it’s the 53rd anniversary of some people writing a letter to a newspaper. Which might not sound remarkable, but the writers were a group of academics, distressed that a colleague had set fire to his career by publishing a book that said Jesus was a mushroom hallucination.

Front cover: The Sacred Mushroom & The Cross, by John M Allegro. Subtitled: Fertility cults and the origins of Judaism and Christianity. Image shows a fly agaric mushroom (the red ones with the white spots)

John Marco Allegro had been a really quite eminent archaeologist and philologist (someone who studies texts), and wrote two respected books in the 1950s, The Dead Sea Scrolls and The People of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Then… things went slightly awry.

Some of Allegro’s points in the book can be put down to the difficulties of translating ancient Aramaic into modern English. Just what is a טיקלא (tiqla), for example? Mind you, even if it does mean ‘bolt’, does it necessarily follow that mushrooms are like cocks?

Excerpt from The Sacred Mushroom & The Cross: The Greek word skandalon, we can now appreciate, originally meant “bolt” like its Aramaic equivalent tiqla”, and we saw earlier how the phallic mushroom was called a “bolt- plant” because the shape of the primitive key or bolt was in essence a short rod surmounted by a knob, and so likened to an erect penis.

(Yes, Stormy Daniels’ description of Donald Trump is where my brain went, too, but I think it’s best not to dwell on such thoughts.)

Allegro’s idea that this early Christian fresco is… well, at least reminiscent of a mushroom isn’t wildly off.

A very old fresco showing Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden either side of the tree of good and evil — which has been drawn in such a way that the top could be said to resemble that of a mushroom. However, there other mushroom-like growths all the way up the trunk, so it’s presumably just a very old, non-naturalistic rendering of a tree. The paint is, was, or has aged to, red, which helps the resemblance to a fly agaric mushroom, but it still isn’t what you’d call incontrovertible

…but there is the small problem that Amanita muscaria, the fly agaric, er… isn’t native to the Middle East.

Watercolour depiction of the fly agaric, 1892. Likely painted at an art class near Bristol, England, the writing says “Agaricus muscarius” and “Leigh woods Sept/92”. Image shows two white mushrooms (including their bulbous roots) with red tops (spotted white). One mushroom has an almost spherical red top, the other has one that’s opened out and is more of a hollow hemisphere

On the face of it, the central idea — that Judaism and Christianity developed from earlier fertility cults sustained by “the sacred mushroom … the Amanita muscaria”, and that its hallucinogenic properties could resemble religious ecstasy — isn’t completely mad.

But when you’re spinning one idea out to book length, things can get a little… stretched, let’s say.

The “knobbed-bolt” epithet of the mush- room, tiqla’, has strong phallic allusions, as we have seen. The fish’s mouth also has a sexual connotation, being envisaged as the large lips of the woman’s genitals. The “bearded” mullet in particular was credited with lustful tendencies and associated with the womb. To have a “shekel (bolt) in the fish’s mouth” was probably a euphemism for coitus.

I haven’t read it in full, but I have flicked through, and it is a bit like being cornered by that guy in the pub/on the train, or reading one of those blogs/Twitter accounts.

(Still, at least this one’s normal #amirite?)

I have, though, read all of William Donaldson’s Brewer’s Rogues, Villains & Eccentrics, which tells me that Allegro thought the God of the Old Testament was

a mighty penis in the heavens who in a thunderous climax of the storm ejaculated semen upon the furrows of Mother Earth

…and I found the bit where Allegro says

Cain and Abel represent the ‘womb’ and the ‘penis’ respectively

because their first names come from the Sumerian ‘Gar-en’ (seed container) and ‘Bal’ (phallus).

We’re also told St Peter’s name is an “obvious play on the Semitic pitra (mushroom)”, and there’s a digression about

the Greek name of the Squirting Cucumber, Ecballium elaterium, whose phallic shape and periodic exudation of a mucilaginous juice gave it sexual allusions which the modern Arab recognizes when he calls the plant, “donkey’s cucumber”.

…and the chapter on the virgin birth quotes Pliny. Fungi are one of the “greatest marvels of nature”, apparently, because they “spring up spontaneously and cannot be grown from seed”. In other words: mushrooms; they’re a bit like Jesus, aren’t they?

Billy Connolly asking “Did Jesus play for Tottenham Hotspur, Daddy?”

And, basically, there’s just an awful lot of genitalia.

The slimy juice of the mushroom which, in some phalloidic species, spills over the “glans” and down the stem, seemed to the ancients like the viscous exudation of the genital organs prior to coitus and the seminal discharge at orgasm. The Hebrew word for “smooth, slimy” derives from a Sumerian phrase meaning “semen running to waste”, and figures in a number of biblical allusions to the mushroom.

An awful lot.

Rain, the semen of the god, was spurted forth from the divine penis at his thunderous orgasm in the heavens, and was borne as “spittle” from the lips of the glans to earth on the storm wind.15 It was a unique concentration of this powerful spermatozoa in the juice of the “Holy Plant” that the Magi believed would give anyone anointed with it amazing power.

Little wonder, then, that his fellow academics felt compelled to write to The Times on this day in 1970.

Letters to the Editor, The Times, 26 May 1970: The Sacred Mushroom and The Cross Sir, A good deal of publicity has recently been given to a book (The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross) by Mr John Allegro. This is a work upon which scholars would not normally wish to comment. But the undersigned, specialists in a number of relevant disciplines and men of several faiths and none, feel it their duty to let it be known that the book is not based on any philological or other evidence…

He replied to defend his “many years of intensive research” and suggest that

when these scholars have actually read and studied the book they will feel better able to offer the world a balanced judgement less clouded with emotion.

So, he can’t have been delighted when Cambridge University Press’s Church History journal published a considered review a year later — by someone who had read it, and thought it was fucking nonsense.

I do not take this book seriously. I find every aspect of the argument, especially the logical and linguistic aspects, decisively unsatisfactory. Is it even worth a serious point-by-point refutation?

Still, he did make Time magazine:

…even if historian Dr Henry Chadwick did write to the Daily Telegraph to say there was

no particle of evidence for all this exciting conjecture. Allegro’s work reads like a Semitic philologist’s erotic nightmare after consuming a highly indigestible meal of hallucinogenic fungi.

According to William Donaldson,

Allegro denied that he had ever consumed this particular mushroom. “I wouldn’t be so bloody stupid,” he affirmed.

--

--

Coates
Coates

Written by Coates

Purveyor of niche drivel; marker of odd anniversaries

No responses yet